Charge. «Disgusting Adonis.»! | Good fort.

For a while, a poet criticized Adonis's experiment on a culture-wide critical platform, dictating his traditional heritage orientation.

The angry fanaticism of Adonis's poets and intellectuals -- let them be called Indonesians -- when one of the people opposes one of their own opinions or hair -- is a phenomenon that deserves to be meditated, a phenomenon that we can find on the basis of which we can find ourselves unsatisfactory, perhaps the answer in 2021 to a question about the value of his hair in the Arab world: “…This [Arabic] culture remains at its core, as I see it as a religion (indigenous, legitimate, in particular), vision and practice. This [...] makes it against knowledge, against man and against life itself. Thus, I splinter Arabs into two parts, some of them, together with me in this view, the few, from which they see that my hair and diabetes are the culmination of poetry and thought in Arabic, and not the same in the history of Arab creativity, especially modernity.

Thus, according to the vision of Adonis and the Indonesians, we find ourselves in front of the old/new king's clothes:The peak of hair and thought."She's at Adonis's, that peak."Unlikely.One has the right to belong toCreative little. Beginning."and enter into her vows, and whoever craved his taste for that."The peak."So it's the most inspiring of the above, that's, that's the one."Against knowledge, against man, against life itself.“.

We don't need to be alerted to this imperfection, as well as to make any human being admired for his work in person the standard in creative vision.

Certainly, in this short article, I would not try to engage with the whole idea of Adonis, but I would like to refer to a few outstanding examples of his ideas, examples that made me put the book aside and ask: why would I read this? What good would it be?Against knowledge, against man, against life itself."

The first, and perhaps fundamentally, forms of transmission of complex poetic phenomena, all of them to historical cultural diversity, ignoring the fact that part of them is due to the nature of the human being, I hope to say, in the context of diminishing the importance of Hebron weights.Weight/recovery is a later cleaning job to shape my previous hair.“.

In fact, weight/responsibility is not an original hypothetical work, so that it's later for a pre-fecture, but vice versa: the weight obligation is preceded by two different sides, equally important:

The first is historical: strict adherence to the weights and strengths of the lakes has been preceded by all the theoretical efforts that have come after it, the obligations of ignorance in weight and extreme rhetoric, such as their commitment to the integrity of the plaintiff ' s exhibits, and its third activation in each part, from the edges, if you look for the parents in which they have departed if they are at least 1%.

The second is natural: some part of the weight has arisen not only on theory, but on culture as a whole, because the rhythm is so biologically constant, it's so unspeakable.

If we put an end to all the violence and demise that we carry within us towards Arab poets, in order not to be accused of having a religious, horizon-legitimist anti-life and human personality, and to have put aside, as well, the objections that we have just made, we will not at least ask what benefit we have from referring nature and culture to a clean-up action, and what good is it to say?

"The tongue, no reality, is the direct substance of the poet's work, in the tongue and in it, the world sees and shapes, this physical practice of the tongue requires it to be knowledgeable of its superior knowledge, perfected the greater prestige of the history of poetic speech, and how to write poetically.

This piece represents a good representation of what is impeccable in the idea of Adonis, if Adonis imposes on the poet to know the highest knowledge of the tongue he writes, but our Arab world, and the Western world too!Higher knowledgeNo.The greatest mastery of the history of poetic speech."but they say from the hair I torture and his purity.

The misery of this idea is reflected in the recent reporting logic that makes the most knowledgeable of the tongue the most human being, on the pretext that a man is defined as a talking animal.

If I look at this statement in its logical form, I mean, without looking at its meaning, it makes sense, because if wine is alcoholic, the most alcoholic wine is not more "proper" than otherwise, it turns into a craving of hands at best, if it goes beyond the same distortion of reasoning and looks at it.

To say thatThe most common knowledge of the tongue is the most human."It requires, for example, that our people in Syria who have spent a decade in the camps, no schools or any human life phenomenon, are less humane than their most fortunate peers who have looted."Higher knowledge"and perfect."The history of poetic speech.It also requires that African slaves in the states have been less human than their worshippers, how not and how the generations of slaves have quickly lost most of their connection to their native tongue, because their slaves have not left those who speak a single African language to meet in a single business group, for fear of insurgency, and then they have not yet learned from English enough.Higher knowledge"in tongue.

It's obvious that this is all corrupt, and that poet Adonis or otherwise does not humanize a hair on a mother who sings for her son to sleep in the tent, and is more likely to lose it.

This idea and what it's like in Adonis is his contempt for readers who are immortal and popular. «Disgusting Adonis.»!